FatFS exFAT label-length stack overflow in f_getlabel()

|
Updated
Vendors ChaN
Products
FatFs
  • FatFs
Related

Executive summary #

CVE-2026-6687 affects ChaN's FatFs R0.16 and earlier. The bug is a stack overflow in f_getlabel() because exFAT label length (XDIR_NumLabel) is trusted without enforcing spec maximums. This maps to CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow). Estimated CVSS v3.1 vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.6, High). The estimated CISA SSVC vectors are Exploitation: PoC, Technical Impact: Total.

Identified downstream projects include STMicroelectronics Middleware FatFS MCU, Zephyr Project Zephyr RTOS, ArduPilot, RIOT OS, and Damien P. George's MicroPython derivatives that call f_getlabel() on attacker-controlled exFAT media.

Technical details #

The vulnerable loop copies label characters using on-disk count directly:

for (si = di = hs = 0; si < dj.dir[XDIR_NumLabel]; si++) {
    wc = ld_16(dj.dir + XDIR_Label + si * 2);
    nw = put_utf((DWORD)hs << 16 | wc, &label[di], 4);
    di += nw;
}

exFAT expects volume label lengths up to 11, but XDIR_NumLabel is a byte and can be set much larger (for example, 128 or 255). Typical calling code uses fixed stack buffers such as char label[12] or char label[24], resulting in substantial overwrite beyond buffer bounds.

Example caller pattern:

char label[12];
DWORD vsn;
f_getlabel("0:", label, &vsn);  <i>/* overflow on crafted exFAT */</i>

For more details, see https://github.com/runZeroInc/vulns-2026-fatfs-chance

Attacker value #

An attacker can convert media insertion and routine label queries into a memory-corruption primitive with strong code-execution potential on bare-metal targets lacking modern mitigations.

Downstream reach is significant through STMicroelectronics Middleware FatFS MCU-generated projects and RTOS ecosystems that expose storage metadata during boot or diagnostics.

Credit #

Discovered by HD Moore, CVE coordination by Tod Beardsley, both of runZero, Inc.

Timeline #

  • 2026-03-17 (Tue): Initial findings discovered and documented
  • 2026-04-20 (Mon): CVE IDs reserved
  • 2026-04-20 (Mon): Initial outreach to the provider, ChaN (no response)
  • 2026-04-27 (Mon): Outreach to JPCERT/CC for coordination help (TN: JPCERT#96 280429)
  • 2026-04-28 (Tue): JPCERT/CC outreach to the provider in Japanese (no response after three attempts)
  • 2026-05-14 (Wed): Outreach to a major downstream implementor upon JPCERT/CC recommendation (responded, but unwilling to receive full details)
  • 2026-06-18 (Thu): Updated JPCERT/CC and downstream vendor with a date change to Jul 1 for disclosure
  • 2026-07-01 (Wed): Public disclosure of CVE-2026-6682

Written by todb

Tod Beardsley is VP of Security Research at runZero, where he "kicks assets and fakes frames." Prior to 2025, he was the Section Chief for the Vulnerability Response section for CSD/VM/VRC at CISA, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the US government, and a seasonal Travis County Election Judge in Texas. He's also a founder and CNA point of contact for AHA!. Tod spends much of his time involved in vulnerability research and coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD). He has over 30 years of hands-on security experience, stretching from in-band telephony switching to modern ICS/OT implementations. He has held IT ops, security, software engineering, and management positions in large organizations such as the US Government, Rapid7, 3Com, Dell, and Westinghouse, as both an offensive and defensive practitioner. Tod is a CVE Board member, has authored several research papers, and is an internationally-tolerated horror fiction expert.

More about todb
Subscribe Now

Get the latest news and expert insights delivered in your inbox.

Welcome to the club! Your subscription to our newsletter is successful.